The future a board imagines

The future a board imagines
Non-executive board appointments rarely receive much attention. A short announcement appears. A biography follows. Experience, continuity, governance. Then the board returns to the agenda.
During a recent board review of a European company, we spent time looking at the composition of the board. The company was performing well. Strategy papers described a future with new digital capabilities, new partnerships and exposure to markets the company had not operated in before.

The recent board appointments were strong individuals. Former executives with deep operational experience. Financial discipline. Long familiarity with the sector.

None of this raised concern at first. Each appointment made sense when viewed separately.
Only when the board began to look at them together did a different question emerge.

What kind of board does this company believe it will need in five or six years, if the strategy actually unfolds as described?

Board composition gradually shapes what a board recognizes quickly, and what remains outside its natural field of attention.

During board reviews we therefore often pause at a simple point of reflection. Not about past performance, but about the future a board may already be preparing itself for.

Dit bericht hoort bij een serie coachingvignetten waarin de ‘Ruthless Compassion’ van NGL verschillende facetten van leiderschap belicht.

Je kunt deze gesprekken ook volgen op onze LinkedIn pagina.

Bercan Günel | Mariëlle de Macker | Vincent Moolenaar | Ron De Mos | Jeanine Tijhaar | Dorine Wekking

Latest news items

 

The Flashlight You Did Not Know You Needed

She had been in the role for four months. Competent, energetic, well-regarded. The organization had moved fast to appoint her, and she had moved fast to deliver. In our first real conversation, she described her priorities, her stakeholders, her plan for the next...

You Think You’re Walking in Daylight

A CEO of a mid-sized industrial company came to us six months into a major strategic reorientation. He had the data. He had the team. He had the board's confidence. The direction was clear.He was not asking for help navigating uncertainty. He was asking us to confirm...

Playing to win or playing to lose

We see a familiar pattern in boardrooms. At some point, the conversation splits: those who play to win, and those who play not to lose. Both positions are understandable. We encounter them in many leadership teams, often side by side. Especially when pressure is high...